Tonight
Tuesday, October 6 · 9 gamesNY Islanders at NY Rangers has the most riding on it: up to 3.7 points of playoff odds either way.
Last Night
Monday, October 51Every result, and the winner's chance from the shots: how often a team wins a game with chances like these.
The winner had the better chances in 3 of 4 games; no robberies.
Results
Winner's chance from the shotsTap a result for its story. Left: the winner's share. Right: the loser's. Robbery = the winner had under 35%; Deserved = 65% or more.
Playoff Odds Movers
Since Monday afternoon2Dallas gained the most since Monday afternoon: up 9.9 points to 45%.
Change in each club's playoff odds since the Monday afternoon update, in percentage points, and where it stands now.
Show as table
| Club | Change (pts) | |
|---|---|---|
| DAL | +9.9 | beat San Jose 5–0 · now 45% |
| TBL | +7.8 | beat Philadelphia 4–1 · now 57% |
| OTT | +5.0 | beat Boston 4–1 · now 61% |
| BOS | −6.3 | lost 4–1 to Ottawa · now 45% |
| PHI | −7.4 | lost 4–1 to Tampa Bay · now 24% |
| SJS | −8.8 | lost 5–0 to Dallas · now 45% |
The Playoff Race
2026-271Every club against the pace for the projected last wild card, game by game: above the line, on course for the playoffs; below, behind.
The last playoff spot is projected at 95 points. Holding it now: Montreal (+0.7 on that pace). First out: NY Islanders (−0.3).
Each line: a club's points minus the pace for 95 points, after each of its games. Above the line, on course for the playoffs; below, behind. In the spots now: OTT, NYR, MTL, FLA, PIT, TBL, CAR, BOS. The chart shows the first 42 games until a club passes halfway. Tap a club to pick out its line.
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Show as table
| OTT | NYR | MTL | FLA | PIT | TBL | BUF | CBJ | NJD | NYI | WSH | CAR | BOS | TOR | DET | PHI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Game 1 | +0.9 | −1.1 | +0.9 | +0.9 | +0.9 | −1.1 | −1.1 | +0.9 | +0.9 | −1.1 | +0.9 | −0.1 | +0.9 | −1.1 | −1.1 | −1.1 |
| Game 2 | +1.7 | −0.3 | +0.7 | +0.7 | +1.7 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −1.3 | +1.7 | −0.3 | −2.3 | −1.3 |
| Game 3 | — | +0.6 | — | +0.6 | +0.6 | +0.6 | — | — | — | — | — | −0.4 | +0.6 | −1.4 | — | −1.4 |
| Game 4 | — | +1.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −0.5 | — | — | −2.5 |
The last playoff spot is projected at 96 points. Holding it now: Vegas (+0.6 on that pace). First out: San Jose (+0.6).
Each line: a club's points minus the pace for 96 points, after each of its games. Above the line, on course for the playoffs; below, behind. In the spots now: ANA, COL, MIN, EDM, WPG, SEA, UTA, VGK. The chart shows the first 42 games until a club passes halfway. Tap a club to pick out its line.
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Show as table
| ANA | COL | MIN | EDM | WPG | SEA | SJS | UTA | VGK | NSH | STL | VAN | LAK | DAL | CGY | CHI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Game 1 | +0.9 | +0.9 | +0.9 | −0.1 | −0.1 | +0.9 | +0.9 | +0.9 | +0.9 | −1.1 | +0.9 | +0.9 | −1.1 | −1.1 | −1.1 | −1.1 |
| Game 2 | +1.7 | +1.7 | +1.7 | +0.7 | +0.7 | −0.3 | +1.7 | +1.7 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −0.3 | −1.3 | −2.3 | −2.3 | −2.3 |
| Game 3 | — | — | — | +1.6 | +1.6 | +0.6 | +0.6 | +0.6 | +0.6 | — | — | +0.6 | — | −1.4 | −3.4 | −3.4 |
| Game 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −0.6 | — | — | — | — |
Deserved Standings
2026-272Deserved points: what each club would have if every game were replayed with the same chances. The gap is luck.
Anaheim has 3 points more than its play deserves; Calgary has 3 points fewer.
Points minus deserved points. Beside each club: its points / deserved points.
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Show as table
| Club | Points minus deserved | |
|---|---|---|
| ANA | +2.7 | 4 / 1.3 |
| SJS | +2.5 | 4 / 1.5 |
| WPG | +1.8 | 5 / 3.2 |
| NYR | +1.6 | 6 / 4.4 |
| MIN | +1.4 | 4 / 2.6 |
| COL | +1.4 | 4 / 2.6 |
| OTT | +1.3 | 4 / 2.7 |
| SEA | +0.9 | 4 / 3.1 |
| MTL | +0.9 | 3 / 2.1 |
| VAN | +0.8 | 4 / 3.2 |
| WSH | +0.5 | 2 / 1.5 |
| STL | +0.4 | 2 / 1.6 |
| EDM | +0.4 | 5 / 4.6 |
| PHI | +0.3 | 2 / 1.7 |
| NSH | +0.2 | 2 / 1.8 |
| CBJ | 0.0 | 2 / 2.0 |
| PIT | −0.1 | 4 / 4.1 |
| UTA | −0.2 | 4 / 4.2 |
| FLA | −0.2 | 4 / 4.2 |
| NYI | −0.4 | 2 / 2.4 |
| BOS | −0.4 | 4 / 4.4 |
| TBL | −0.4 | 4 / 4.4 |
| VGK | −0.8 | 4 / 4.8 |
| TOR | −0.9 | 2 / 2.9 |
| BUF | −0.9 | 2 / 2.9 |
| NJD | −1.0 | 2 / 3.0 |
| CAR | −1.4 | 3 / 4.4 |
| CHI | −1.8 | 0 / 1.8 |
| LAK | −1.9 | 1 / 2.9 |
| DAL | −2.1 | 2 / 4.1 |
| DET | −2.4 | 0 / 2.4 |
| CGY | −2.8 | 0 / 2.8 |
Team Finishing
All situations3Goals scored against expected goals: who is finishing above or below its chances. It usually evens out.
Vancouver has scored 9.3 goals more than its chances say; Carolina 5.9 goals fewer.
Goals minus expected goals, all situations, shootouts aside. Beside each club: its goals / expected goals.
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Show as table
| Club | Goals minus xG | |
|---|---|---|
| VAN | +9.3 | 19 / 9.7 |
| COL | +7.8 | 14 / 6.2 |
| EDM | +6.6 | 17 / 10.4 |
| SEA | +4.9 | 13 / 8.1 |
| PIT | +4.5 | 15 / 10.5 |
| ANA | +2.5 | 7 / 4.5 |
| SJS | +2.2 | 9 / 6.8 |
| UTA | +1.9 | 12 / 10.1 |
| CBJ | +1.8 | 7 / 5.2 |
| MTL | +1.4 | 8 / 6.6 |
| LAK | +1.3 | 8 / 6.7 |
| WSH | +0.6 | 6 / 5.4 |
| NYI | +0.3 | 7 / 6.7 |
| OTT | −0.1 | 7 / 7.1 |
| BUF | −0.3 | 7 / 7.3 |
| STL | −0.4 | 5 / 5.4 |
| VGK | −0.5 | 11 / 11.5 |
| MIN | −0.6 | 7 / 7.6 |
| NSH | −1.1 | 3 / 4.1 |
| CHI | −1.4 | 5 / 6.4 |
| WPG | −2.1 | 9 / 11.1 |
| NYR | −2.3 | 11 / 13.3 |
| BOS | −2.4 | 9 / 11.4 |
| TOR | −2.6 | 6 / 8.6 |
| PHI | −3.0 | 5 / 8.0 |
| DAL | −3.2 | 6 / 9.2 |
| FLA | −3.4 | 6 / 9.4 |
| DET | −3.5 | 2 / 5.5 |
| CGY | −4.5 | 3 / 7.5 |
| TBL | −5.0 | 8 / 13.0 |
| NJD | −5.4 | 3 / 8.4 |
| CAR | −5.9 | 5 / 10.9 |
League Personality Map
5 on 54Chances created against chances allowed: up and right is where playoff teams live.
9 clubs sit in the playoff-ready corner, creating more chances than the median club and allowing fewer; New Jersey has the best balance.
5-on-5 expected goals for and against per 60 minutes. Dashed lines: the league medians. Based on 2 games for some clubs, so it will change a lot early in the season.
Tap or hover over a club to see its personality.
Show as table
| Club | xGF/60 | xGA/60 | Personality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NJD | 4.04 | 2.12 | Puck hogs |
| NYI | 2.93 | 3.23 | Goalie carrying them |
| NYR | 2.63 | 2.82 | Goalie carrying them |
| PHI | 1.44 | 4.02 | Hemmed in |
| PIT | 3.10 | 2.12 | Special-teams merchants |
| BOS | 2.53 | 2.21 | Middle of the pack |
| BUF | 3.25 | 2.15 | Puck hogs |
| MTL | 2.44 | 2.50 | Middle of the pack |
| OTT | 3.03 | 2.76 | Run-and-gun |
| TOR | 2.70 | 2.91 | Goalie carrying them |
| CAR | 2.73 | 2.57 | Middle of the pack |
| FLA | 2.36 | 1.12 | Shutdown |
| TBL | 3.66 | 2.18 | Puck hogs |
| WSH | 2.84 | 3.35 | Goalie carrying them |
| CHI | 2.06 | 3.64 | Hemmed in |
| DET | 2.52 | 2.04 | Unlucky: better than the record |
| NSH | 2.03 | 2.45 | Middle of the pack |
| STL | 2.51 | 2.93 | Middle of the pack |
| CGY | 2.65 | 2.94 | Special-teams merchants |
| COL | 3.15 | 2.38 | Special-teams merchants |
| EDM | 2.61 | 1.90 | Shutdown |
| VAN | 1.89 | 2.69 | Hemmed in |
| ANA | 1.79 | 2.57 | Living dangerously |
| DAL | 2.64 | 2.14 | Unlucky: better than the record |
| LAK | 2.86 | 1.96 | Unlucky: better than the record |
| SJS | 1.36 | 3.14 | Living dangerously |
| CBJ | 2.23 | 2.03 | Shutdown |
| MIN | 2.38 | 2.07 | Special-teams merchants |
| WPG | 2.38 | 2.94 | Living dangerously |
| VGK | 3.00 | 1.92 | Built for the playoffs |
| SEA | 2.74 | 2.83 | Goalie carrying them |
| UTA | 3.08 | 2.43 | Special-teams merchants |
Clutch Teams
Late and close5Who wins the close ones: late goals, one-goal games, comebacks and overtime.
Boston leads the league in team Clutch Score (8.0) and has won 1 of 1 one-goal game.
Team Clutch Score: the club's goals late in close games and in overtime, scored the same way as the players' (scorers only). Beside each club: its record in one-goal games, overtime and shootouts included (and two-goal wins with an empty-netter, as on the team pages).
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Show as table
| For | Against | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Club | GP | Clutch | 1-goal | OT/SO | TIE | GAG | TIE | GAG | CB |
| Boston Bruins | 4 | 8.0 | 1-0-0 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| San Jose Sharks | 3 | 6.0 | 2-0-0 | 2-0-0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Florida Panthers | 3 | 5.5 | 1-0-2 | 1-0-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Edmonton Oilers | 3 | 4.5 | 1-0-1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Vancouver Canucks | 4 | 3.5 | 1-1-0 | 1-0-0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Anaheim Ducks | 2 | 3.0 | 2-0-0 | 1-0-0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| New Jersey Devils | 2 | 3.0 | 1-0-0 | 1-0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 3 | 3.0 | 1-0-1 | 1-0-1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Montreal Canadiens | 2 | 3.0 | 1-0-1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 3 | 3.0 | 1-1-0 | 1-0-0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Buffalo Sabres | 2 | 2.0 | 1-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Los Angeles Kings | 2 | 2.0 | 0-0-1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| New York Rangers | 4 | 0.5 | 2-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 3 | 0.5 | 1-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 2 | 0.5 | 0-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nashville Predators | 2 | 0.0 | 1-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ottawa Senators | 2 | 0.0 | 1-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Winnipeg Jets | 3 | 0.0 | 2-0-1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 4 | 0.0 | 0-0-2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Vegas Golden Knights | 3 | 0.0 | 1-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 3 | 0.0 | 1-2-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 3 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dallas Stars | 3 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Detroit Red Wings | 2 | 0.0 | 0-2-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| New York Islanders | 2 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Seattle Kraken | 3 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Utah Mammoth | 3 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Washington Capitals | 2 | 0.0 | 0-1-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Calgary Flames | 3 | 0.0 | 0-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Colorado Avalanche | 2 | 0.0 | 0-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota Wild | 2 | 0.0 | 0-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| St. Louis Blues | 2 | 0.0 | 0-0-0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Late = the last 10 minutes of the third period, or overtime. TIE = tying goals, GAG = go-ahead goals (an overtime winner counts), CB = wins after trailing by two or more. Regular season only.
Team Rankings
2026-276The top three and bottom three clubs in every category. Arrows: places gained or lost in the past week.
Every club's stats, sortable →
The arrows start once there's a week of games to compare.
The standings
Points %
Share of available points won.
| Rank | Club | Points % | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anaheim Ducks | 1.000 | |
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | 1.000 | |
| 1 | Minnesota Wild | 1.000 | |
| 30 | Calgary Flames | .000 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | .000 | |
| 30 | Detroit Red Wings | .000 |
Goal differential
Goals scored minus goals allowed, per game.
| Rank | Club | Goal differential | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | +4.50 | |
| 2 | Seattle Kraken | +2.67 | |
| 3 | Minnesota Wild | +2.50 | |
| 30 | Philadelphia Flyers | −3.00 | |
| 31 | Chicago Blackhawks | −3.33 | |
| 32 | Calgary Flames | −4.33 |
Last 10 games
Same as points % until clubs have played more than 10 games.
| Rank | Club | Last 10 games | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anaheim Ducks | 1.000 | |
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | 1.000 | |
| 1 | Minnesota Wild | 1.000 | |
| 30 | Calgary Flames | .000 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | .000 | |
| 30 | Detroit Red Wings | .000 |
Scoring
Goals per game
Goals scored per game, all situations.
| Rank | Club | Goals per game | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | 7.00 | |
| 2 | Edmonton Oilers | 5.67 | |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 5.00 | |
| 30 | Philadelphia Flyers | 1.25 | |
| 31 | Calgary Flames | 1.00 | |
| 31 | Detroit Red Wings | 1.00 |
Shots per game
Shots on goal per game.
| Rank | Club | Shots per game | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey Devils | 40.50 | |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 33.33 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles Kings | 33.00 | |
| 29 | Columbus Blue Jackets | 20.50 | |
| 31 | Philadelphia Flyers | 19.00 | |
| 32 | Chicago Blackhawks | 18.67 |
Expected goals per game
Every shot weighted by its chance of going in, per game: the quality of chances created.
| Rank | Club | Expected goals per game | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 4.32 | |
| 2 | New Jersey Devils | 4.19 | |
| 3 | Vegas Golden Knights | 3.83 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 2.12 | |
| 31 | Nashville Predators | 2.07 | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 2.00 |
Keeping it out
Goals against per game
Goals allowed per game. Lower is better.
| Rank | Club | Goals against per game | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minnesota Wild | 1.00 | |
| 1 | New York Islanders | 1.00 | |
| 3 | New York Rangers | 1.50 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 5.00 | |
| 31 | Calgary Flames | 5.33 | |
| 32 | Los Angeles Kings | 6.50 |
Shots against per game
Shots on goal allowed per game. Lower is better.
| Rank | Club | Shots against per game | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah Mammoth | 18.33 | |
| 2 | Buffalo Sabres | 19.00 | |
| 3 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 20.00 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 32.33 | |
| 30 | Winnipeg Jets | 32.33 | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 39.50 |
Expected goals against
Quality of chances allowed per game. Lower is better.
| Rank | Club | Expected goals against | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vegas Golden Knights | 1.93 | |
| 2 | Edmonton Oilers | 2.12 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles Kings | 2.26 | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 4.08 | |
| 31 | Washington Capitals | 4.44 | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 4.60 |
Special teams
Power play
Share of power plays that produce a goal.
| Rank | Club | Power play | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah Mammoth | 66.7% | |
| 2 | Anaheim Ducks | 50.0% | |
| 2 | Winnipeg Jets | 50.0% | |
| 23 | Philadelphia Flyers | 0.0% | |
| 23 | St. Louis Blues | 0.0% | |
| 23 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 0.0% |
Penalty kill
Share of opponent power plays killed off.
| Rank | Club | Penalty kill | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | 100.0% | |
| 1 | Minnesota Wild | 100.0% | |
| 1 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 100.0% | |
| 30 | Edmonton Oilers | 57.1% | |
| 31 | Detroit Red Wings | 50.0% | |
| 32 | Los Angeles Kings | 28.6% |
Faceoffs
Share of faceoffs won.
| Rank | Club | Faceoffs | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles Kings | 58.2% | |
| 2 | Montreal Canadiens | 57.9% | |
| 3 | Detroit Red Wings | 56.7% | |
| 30 | Anaheim Ducks | 43.9% | |
| 31 | St. Louis Blues | 41.1% | |
| 32 | Chicago Blackhawks | 39.9% |
5-on-5 play
Expected goals share
Share of 5-on-5 expected goals: the best single measure of who controls play.
| Rank | Club | Expected goals share | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida Panthers | 67.8% | |
| 2 | New Jersey Devils | 65.6% | |
| 3 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 62.7% | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 36.1% | |
| 31 | San Jose Sharks | 30.2% | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 26.4% |
Shot attempt share
Share of 5-on-5 shot attempts: who has the puck more.
| Rank | Club | Shot attempt share | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey Devils | 66.0% | |
| 2 | Buffalo Sabres | 61.6% | |
| 3 | Detroit Red Wings | 59.2% | |
| 30 | San Jose Sharks | 39.8% | |
| 31 | Chicago Blackhawks | 39.7% | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 33.0% |
High-danger share
Share of 5-on-5 chances from right in front of the net.
| Rank | Club | High-danger share | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 71.1% | |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 68.4% | |
| 3 | Florida Panthers | 65.5% | |
| 30 | Chicago Blackhawks | 38.9% | |
| 31 | San Jose Sharks | 27.3% | |
| 32 | Philadelphia Flyers | 25.8% |
Goaltending and luck
Save %
Share of shots on goal the goalies stopped (empty-net goals don't count).
| Rank | Club | Save % | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York Islanders | .968 | |
| 2 | Minnesota Wild | .957 | |
| 3 | Seattle Kraken | .951 | |
| 30 | Edmonton Oilers | .785 | |
| 31 | Buffalo Sabres | .784 | |
| 32 | Los Angeles Kings | .759 |
Goals saved above expected
Goals the goalies stopped beyond what an average goalie would, given the shots.
| Rank | Club | Goals saved above expected | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York Rangers | +5.8 | |
| 2 | Seattle Kraken | +4.7 | |
| 3 | New York Islanders | +4.3 | |
| 30 | Calgary Flames | −5.9 | |
| 31 | Edmonton Oilers | −7.6 | |
| 32 | Los Angeles Kings | −8.5 |
PDO (luck gauge)
5-on-5 shooting % plus save %. Far above 100 usually means a hot streak that won't last.
| Rank | Club | PDO (luck gauge) | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Avalanche | 115.7 | |
| 2 | Seattle Kraken | 111.7 | |
| 3 | Ottawa Senators | 109.2 | |
| 30 | Buffalo Sabres | 89.1 | |
| 31 | Los Angeles Kings | 88.8 | |
| 32 | Calgary Flames | 83.3 |
Territory and speed (NHL EDGE)
Offensive zone time
Share of the game spent in the other team's end, all situations (NHL EDGE).
| Rank | Club | Offensive zone time | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carolina Hurricanes | 47.6% | |
| 2 | Edmonton Oilers | 45.8% | |
| 3 | Minnesota Wild | 45.1% | |
| 30 | San Jose Sharks | 36.0% | |
| 31 | Philadelphia Flyers | 35.7% | |
| 32 | Washington Capitals | 33.2% |
Defensive zone time
Share of the game spent in its own end, all situations (NHL EDGE). Lower is better.
| Rank | Club | Defensive zone time | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carolina Hurricanes | 34.7% | |
| 2 | Buffalo Sabres | 35.9% | |
| 3 | New Jersey Devils | 36.5% | |
| 30 | San Jose Sharks | 45.5% | |
| 31 | Philadelphia Flyers | 46.2% | |
| 32 | Washington Capitals | 48.9% |
Speed bursts over 22 mph
Times per game one of its skaters topped 22 mph (NHL EDGE).
| Rank | Club | Speed bursts over 22 mph | Change this week |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edmonton Oilers | 6.67 | |
| 2 | Colorado Avalanche | 4.00 | |
| 3 | Washington Capitals | 3.00 | |
| 28 | Utah Mammoth | 0.33 | |
| 31 | Detroit Red Wings | 0.00 | |
| 31 | Ottawa Senators | 0.00 |
Late and close
Clutch Score
Goals and assists late in close games and in overtime: 3 for an overtime winner, 2 for a late equalizer or go-ahead goal. What's this?
3.85 Clutch Score, the league lead
David Pastrnak Boston BruinsLeads the league: 2 clutch assists
| Rank | Player | Clutch Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | David PastrnakBoston Bruins2 clutch assists | 3.85 |
| 2 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers1 late go-ahead goal, 1 clutch assist | 3.75 |
| 3 | Macklin CelebriniSan Jose Sharks2 clutch assists | 3.60 |
| 4 | JJ PeterkaBoston Bruins1 OT winner, 1 insurance goal | 3.50 |
| 5 | Mikael GranlundAnaheim Ducks1 OT winner | 3.00 |
| 5 | Gustav ForslingFlorida Panthers1 OT winner | 3.00 |
| 5 | Jack HughesNew Jersey Devils1 OT winner | 3.00 |
| 5 | Shayne GostisbehereCarolina Hurricanes1 OT winner | 3.00 |
| 5 | Tommy NovakPittsburgh Penguins1 OT winner | 3.00 |
| 5 | Luca CagnoniSan Jose Sharks1 OT winner | 3.00 |
2 more tied at 3.00.
Hot and due
Shooting vs career
Goals this season against what his own career shooting % would give on the same shots (50+ career shots needed). What's this?
Running hot
| Rank | Player | Goals vs career rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evan Bouchard Edmonton Oilers30.8% this season · 7.0% career | +3.1 |
| 2 | Paul Cotter Vancouver Canucks57.1% this season · 13.9% career | +3.0 |
| 3 | Artturi Lehkonen Colorado Avalanche60.0% this season · 11.6% career | +2.4 |
| 4 | Eeli Tolvanen New York Rangers50.0% this season · 12.0% career | +2.3 |
| 5 | Nick Schmaltz Utah Mammoth30.8% this season · 14.0% career | +2.2 |
Due
| Rank | Player | Goals vs career rate |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Pastrnak Due on both countsBoston Bruins0.0% this season · 13.6% career | −2.0 |
| 2 | Brandon Hagel Due on both countsTampa Bay Lightning5.9% this season · 15.7% career | −1.7 |
| 3 | Wyatt Johnston Due on both countsDallas Stars0.0% this season · 17.1% career | −1.5 |
| 4 | Sidney Crosby Due on both countsPittsburgh Penguins0.0% this season · 14.7% career | −1.5 |
| 5 | Andrei Svechnikov Due on both countsCarolina Hurricanes0.0% this season · 12.1% career | −1.5 |
Due on both counts: below his career rate and below his expected goals too.
Some clubs have played only 2 games, so these numbers will move a lot.
Player of the Week
Through Monday, October 51The best average rating out of 10 over the past seven days, at least 3 games.
9.0 average rating out of 10
Connor McDavid Edmonton OilersAverage rating over 3 games, Sep 29 to Oct 5
| Date | Opponent | Result | Line | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29 | vs Vancouver Canucks | OTL 5–6 | 2 assists | 8.3 |
| Oct 1 | at Vancouver Canucks | W 9–7 | 1 goal, 4 assists | 9.7 |
| Oct 3 | vs Seattle Kraken | W 3–1 | 1 goal, 1 assist | 9.1 |
Player Rankings
2026-272The top five in every category. Averages and rates need at least 1 game. Arrows: places gained or lost in the past week.
Every player's stats, sortable →
The arrows start once there's a week of games to compare.
Scoring
Points
Goals plus assists.
| Rank | Player | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connor McDavidEdmonton Oilers2 G, 7 A | 9 |
| 2 | Evan BouchardEdmonton Oilers4 G, 4 A | 8 |
| 3 | Jack EichelVegas Golden Knights1 G, 5 A | 6 |
| 3 | Elias PetterssonVancouver Canucks2 G, 4 A | 6 |
| 3 | Paul CotterVancouver Canucks4 G, 2 A | 6 |
Goals
Goals scored (shootouts don't count).
| Rank | Player | Goals |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nick SchmaltzUtah Mammoth3 GP | 4 |
| 1 | Evan BouchardEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 4 |
| 1 | Paul CotterVancouver Canucks4 GP | 4 |
| 4 | Artturi LehkonenColorado Avalanche2 GP | 3 |
| 4 | Kirill KaprizovMinnesota Wild2 GP | 3 |
7 more tied at 3.
Assists
First and second assists.
| Rank | Player | Assists |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connor McDavidEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 7 |
| 2 | Macklin CelebriniSan Jose Sharks2 GP | 5 |
| 2 | Jack EichelVegas Golden Knights3 GP | 5 |
| 2 | Clayton KellerUtah Mammoth3 GP | 5 |
| 2 | Filip HronekVancouver Canucks4 GP | 5 |
Shooting
Shots on goal
Shots that hit the net or went in.
| Rank | Player | Shots on goal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kyle ConnorWinnipeg Jets3 GP | 20 |
| 2 | Brandon HagelTampa Bay Lightning3 GP | 17 |
| 3 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 15 |
| 3 | David PastrnakBoston Bruins4 GP | 15 |
| 3 | Pavel DorofeyevNew York Rangers4 GP | 15 |
Expected goals
Every shot he took, weighted by its chance of going in: who gets the best looks.
| Rank | Player | Expected goals |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandon HagelTampa Bay Lightning1 G | 3.0 |
| 2 | Tomas HertlVegas Golden Knights1 G | 3.0 |
| 3 | Cole PerfettiWinnipeg Jets2 G | 2.4 |
| 4 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers3 G | 2.4 |
| 5 | William EklundOttawa Senators0 G | 2.3 |
5-on-5 points per 60
5-on-5 points per 60 minutes at 5-on-5: scoring that doesn't need the power play.
| Rank | Player | 5-on-5 points per 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker KellyColorado Avalanche4 pts in 22 min | 10.77 |
| 2 | Nathan MacKinnonColorado Avalanche4 pts in 26 min | 9.21 |
| 3 | Nicolas RoyColorado Avalanche3 pts in 21 min | 8.60 |
| 4 | Martin NecasColorado Avalanche4 pts in 28 min | 8.54 |
| 5 | Evan BouchardEdmonton Oilers7 pts in 56 min | 7.47 |
Impact and form
Average rating
Our game rating out of 10, averaged over every game.
| Rank | Player | Average rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connor McDavidEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 9.0 |
| 2 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 8.8 |
| 2 | Evan BouchardEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 8.8 |
| 4 | Nathan MacKinnonColorado Avalanche2 GP | 8.8 |
| 5 | Vasily PodkolzinEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 8.6 |
On-ice expected goals share
Share of 5-on-5 expected goals while he's on the ice: who tilts the ice.
| Rank | Player | On-ice expected goals share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corey PerryLos Angeles Kings1 GP | 95.4% |
| 2 | Ty EmbersonEdmonton Oilers1 GP | 91.8% |
| 3 | Bokondji ImamaFlorida Panthers3 GP | 90.2% |
| 4 | Uvis BalinskisFlorida Panthers2 GP | 87.7% |
| 5 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 87.2% |
Point streaks
Active runs of 3 or more games with a point.
| Rank | Player | Point streaks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elias PetterssonVancouver Canucks2 G, 4 A | 4 games |
| 1 | Paul CotterVancouver Canucks4 G, 2 A | 4 games |
| 3 | Adam FoxNew York Rangers0 G, 4 A | 3 games |
| 3 | Eeli TolvanenNew York Rangers3 G, 0 A | 3 games |
| 3 | Gabe PerreaultNew York Rangers2 G, 1 A | 3 games |
16 more tied at 3 games.
Workload and grit
Ice time per game
Minutes played per game, all situations (skaters).
| Rank | Player | Ice time per game |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zach WerenskiColumbus Blue Jackets2 GP | 30:15 |
| 2 | Jackson LaCombeAnaheim Ducks2 GP | 29:09 |
| 3 | Seth JonesFlorida Panthers3 GP | 28:26 |
| 4 | Denton MateychukColumbus Blue Jackets2 GP | 27:48 |
| 5 | Tristan LuneauAnaheim Ducks2 GP | 26:47 |
Hits
Body checks thrown.
| Rank | Player | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiefer SherwoodSan Jose Sharks3 GP | 20 |
| 2 | Elias PetterssonVancouver Canucks4 GP | 19 |
| 3 | Nikita ZadorovBoston Bruins4 GP | 17 |
| 4 | Martin PospisilCalgary Flames3 GP | 16 |
| 4 | Tanner JeannotBoston Bruins4 GP | 16 |
Blocked shots
Shots blocked on the way to his net.
| Rank | Player | Blocked shots |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Filip HronekVancouver Canucks4 GP | 17 |
| 2 | Vladislav GavrikovNew York Rangers4 GP | 13 |
| 3 | Connor MurphyEdmonton Oilers3 GP | 12 |
| 3 | Nick SeelerPhiladelphia Flyers4 GP | 12 |
| 5 | Adam LarssonSeattle Kraken3 GP | 10 |
2 more tied at 10.
In goal
Goals saved above expected
Goals the shots he faced should have produced, minus goals let in.
| Rank | Player | Goals saved above expected |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ilya SorokinNew York Islanders2 GP | +4.3 |
| 2 | Igor ShesterkinNew York Rangers3 GP | +4.2 |
| 3 | Joey DaccordSeattle Kraken2 GP | +3.6 |
| 4 | Joel HoferSt. Louis Blues1 GP | +3.1 |
| 5 | Joseph WollPhiladelphia Flyers2 GP | +2.9 |
Save %
Share of shots on goal stopped.
| Rank | Player | Save % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joel HoferSt. Louis Blues1 GP | 1.000 |
| 1 | Dylan GarandNew York Rangers1 GP | 1.000 |
| 3 | Ilya SorokinNew York Islanders2 GP | .968 |
| 4 | Joey DaccordSeattle Kraken2 GP | .966 |
| 5 | Anthony StolarzToronto Maple Leafs1 GP | .963 |
Quality starts
Starts at league-average save % or better (or .885 on a quiet night).
| Rank | Player | Quality starts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Igor ShesterkinNew York Rangers3 of 3 starts | 3 |
| 2 | Linus UllmarkOttawa Senators2 of 2 starts | 2 |
| 2 | Juuse SarosNashville Predators2 of 2 starts | 2 |
| 2 | Ilya SorokinNew York Islanders2 of 2 starts | 2 |
| 2 | Joey DaccordSeattle Kraken2 of 2 starts | 2 |
6 more tied at 2.
A closer look
Primary points
Goals plus first assists: who drives the scoring, rather than collecting second assists.
| Rank | Player | Primary points |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connor McDavidEdmonton Oilers2 G, 5 first assists | 7 |
| 2 | Evan BouchardEdmonton Oilers4 G, 2 first assists | 6 |
| 2 | Paul CotterVancouver Canucks4 G, 2 first assists | 6 |
| 4 | Nick SchmaltzUtah Mammoth4 G, 0 first assists | 4 |
| 4 | Leon DraisaitlEdmonton Oilers3 G, 1 first assist | 4 |
8 more tied at 4.
Empty-net points
Goals and assists on goals into an empty net, goals beside. An empty-net insurance goal already counts for nothing in Clutch Score.
| Rank | Player | Empty-net points |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eeli TolvanenNew York Rangers2 of his 3 points into an empty net. | 22 G |
| 1 | Igor ShesterkinNew York RangersAll 2 of his points into an empty net. | 21 G |
| 1 | Nikita KucherovTampa Bay Lightning2 of his 4 points into an empty net. | 20 G |
| 4 | Kirill KaprizovMinnesota Wild1 of his 3 points into an empty net. | 11 G |
| 4 | Mathieu OlivierColumbus Blue JacketsHis only point: into an empty net. | 11 G |
22 more tied at 1.
Really bad starts
Share of his starts with a save % under .850, highest first. Needs 3 starts, and 1 for every 4 games his club has played.
| Rank | Player | Really bad starts |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrei VasilevskiyTampa Bay Lightning1 of 3 starts · 67% quality | 33% |
| 1 | Jeremy SwaymanBoston Bruins1 of 3 starts · 67% quality | 33% |
| 1 | Kevin LankinenVancouver Canucks1 of 3 starts · 33% quality | 33% |
| 1 | Yaroslav AskarovSan Jose Sharks1 of 3 starts · 0% quality | 33% |